S “Coverham was nr1 on ratings” DH “and we miss one” how the seed of doubt so quickly spreads.

Have I ever said we only back top rated? No

How did we miss one, only way is if we fail to get a bet on a winning selection, Coverham was not a selection?

Second guessing, presuming is what you are doing.

Because the top rated won, no one mentioned it before when this has happened.

It was a no bet race but I thought the second had a great chance @ 12/1 and worth a bet, sorry it didn’t work out.

How come a newbie presumes that all selections are top rated; a lot are but not all.

How come no one’s mentioned these top rated we didn't back, or all the others for that matter.

2-00 PONTEFRACT 5 WEMYSS POINT W

3-00 PONTEFRACT 3 DAPPER MAN L

4-00 PONTEFRACT 5 ALBA DE TORMES L

1-40 WINDSOR 2 HAWRIDGE FLYER L

3-40 WINDSOR 2 SARAH'S VERSE L

4-15 WINDSOR 3 TWICE AS LIKELY L

4-45 WINDSOR 3 BAD COMPANY L

DH you say you’ve followed selections for 5 years, if you followed me to the letter you will never have had a losing year.